Posts Tagged "Mobile Websites"

This post today on MobileMarketingWatch.com cites a Business Week article in which the Apple honcho bluntly describes his view of the utility offered by current mobile advertising formats.  He also apparently sees this as an opportunity for Apple to innovate and ultimately dominate the mobile ad medium, even in the face of online ad champ Google and its mobile focus.  We have speculated as much here.

Just the other day we blogged about the hype around mobile advertising created by recent acquisitions.  We’ve also covered issues surrounding mobile ad metrics.

We’re keeping close tabs on developments in this area for our customers so they understand where to prioritize mobile advertising alongside their broader customer engagement charters inclusive of SMS text messaging, mobile optimized websites, smartphone applications and social media.

An integrated approach to mobile channel marketing – akin to creating more effective mobile ads – is an innovation which greatly increases the likelihood your mobile marketing efforts won’t suck.

That’s the phrase which popped into my mind upon seeing this January 14, 2010 post on MobileMarketingWatch, titled “Tracking Mobile Ad Click Rates: Symbian Rules.”

Mobile advertising, just like traditional web ads, is an exciting area because of the reach and audience segmentation possibilities.  In parallel with significant investment moves by Google and Apple to get involved via acquisition, the hype around mobile ads is at a fever pitch right now.  I’m afraid customers and investors who fixate here are in for some disappointment down the line, however.

Click through rate, or CTR, is the measure by which mobile and traditional online ads alike are gauged, and the article highlights global research showing that the unlikely Symbian platform is the leader in offering high CTRs, even in the U.S. where it’s not as dominant in terms of market share.

Clearly, a lot of advertisers are thinking “I have to be on Symbian” yet the hype and press would never point an ad buyer at this platform as opposed to the iPhone or a Google Android device.

Advertisers need to remember as well, where are those who click through going to?  A mobile optimized landing page or website?  A smartphone application download?  A coupon or bar code for redemption at the point of sale?  If the answer to any of these is “none of the above” and instead “we’re just happy to have lots of eyeballs seeing our message,” a huge opportunity to drive sales, engender loyalty, or cultivate brand affinity is wasted.

Viewing mobile as an engagement channel that allows businesses to create highly personal interactions that induce action on the part of customers is the real opportunity represented by mobile advertising.  It needs to be viewed as just one part of the value equation, which is why marketers are increasingly coming to Interactive Mediums to leverage our mobile customer engagement platform and expertise around creating effective mobile dialogues with customers across SMS text messaging, mobile web, apps and social media.

Dwell time was a concept I first came across years ago as a web analytics measure designed to provide ecommerce marketers with insight into how long a visitor took to either make a buy decision or abandon the site for another.  It seems the same is happening around mobile enabled consumers as they browse retail stores, introducing new challenges for marketers.

Although it doesn’t say so, this post yesterday on eMarketer.com suggests that providing incentives designed to keep your mobile savvy customers in store is closely tied to ensuring they don’t bail and visit another store for a better deal:

“The threat comes from in-store shoppers using their phones to check sales prices at other retailers.  Compete found that 41% of iPhone users and 43% of Android users do just that.”

“You could argue that every retailer on the planet is an off-balance-sheet showroom for Amazon.  So if you go into a retailer’s store and you see something you like—type in that manufacturer’s SKU number and check the price on Amazon. You’ve looked at it, you’ve touched it, felt it, and now you’re getting the benefit of potentially getting the best price on it too.”

To meet this challenge, the post recommends “A retailer’s best defense for maintaining customer loyalty is to develop a mobile offering that allows in-store shoppers access to customer reviews and other product information on its Website.   This is where the opportunity lies for retailers.  By providing mobile access to their extensive online product information, they help customers feel more comfortable about making a purchase.”

This is a logical recommendation, yet it will not prevent price sensitive, mobile enabled customers from comparison shopping and potentially leaving the store.  It also ignores reseach suggesting that loyalty not be the target, but rather engagement.

To keep customers in-store and increase the probability of purchase, retailers should build engagement strategies into their mobile plans such as text message promotions like sweepstakes and other contests.

Consumers value their time as much as their money, which is why many are excited at the prospect of instantly performing a price comparison quickly then moving onto another store.  Retailers who create engaging mobile programs that keep customers in-store such as promotions lessen the likelihood that they will take the time to visit another store.

Today I spoke with Donna Longino of UPS about her company’s recently announced Blackberry smartphone application.  A leading delivery service such as UPS is a logical fit for mobile technologies, especially for drivers needing to stay connected while “on the go.”

Yes, that’s a UPS truck snapped today outside the local Starbucks, in all the glory of Chicago winter weather on the company’s busiest day – some 20 million packages according to Donna.

Yet, the Blackberry application, like an iPhone version preceding it, is designed to enable business and consumer customers alike to find a drop off location, receive shipping quotes, order pickups and check on package delivery status.  Dig beneath the details, as we did with Donna, and you gain a greater appreciation for what was involved:

• UPS employs an Information Technology group 5,000 strong, who possess deep mobile application expertise and were responsible for creating applications which interact with UPS’ massive global network of package and delivery data.
• Considerable research went into creating the new mobile application, to understand how best to serve their customers and offer a differentiated user experience from competing delivery services.  To these ends, UPS discovered customers wanted a fully native application as opposed to be directed to a mobile website.  Why?  Because application code can be fully loaded on a handset.  From the user’s perspective, this offers a more natural responsiveness consumers associate with desktop computer applications, with time taken only to bring new data across the network.  Navigating a website, even one optimized for mobile, can often seem more cumbersome and of course in the event of a network lapse the session will end abruptly.  Moreover, the UPS app allows consumers to log into the application once, and automatically upon launch relate any packages to their account to view instant status – no keying in of lengthy tracking numbers are required.
• Some UPS business customers are beginning to request the ability to have text messages sent to recipients and/or senders, providing notification of package delivery.  Even greater reach could be possible were UPS to enable customers to text their tracking numbers to receive instant updates – all of which are capabilities available in Interactive Mediums’ Engagement Platform.

Few organizations have the staff, funding or internal systems to execute a mobile strategy to the extent UPS has; for those who lack any of these critical pieces firms like Interactive Mediums stand ready with a flexible Customer Engagement Platform optimized for mobile interactions as well as a wealth of experience developing mobile applications which map to the way consumers want to engage with a business.

As UPS says “What Can Brown Do For You?” we say “How can Interactive Mediums power more effective mobile interactions for your customers?”

Today on MobileMarketer.com Interactive Mediums client Budweiser was featured for their strategic and creative efforts to target customers in the mobile channel.  During the summer of 2009, the company targeted the mobile customer experience to great effect, blending a Smartphone application, mobile website and interactive SMS text message promotion.

In 2006, Budweiser partnered with Interactive Mediums to power a similar SMS text message sweepstakes at the point of sale.  As both established and smaller brands alike take their initial steps into mobile marketing, sweepstakes are a proven approach to engaging customers in the mobile channel to drive sales, improve loyalty or build a brand.  As 2010 is about to open, marketers and promotional services providers in any discipline – branding, demand creation, or loyalty – owe it to their companies and clients to investigate this powerful promotional tactic as part of their plans.

Budweiser’s news is especially timely given recent posts about why mobile sweepstakes and contests are an absolute necessity for brand engagement and best practices for executing winning promotions.

It was notable today that on Retailwire.com there was a news item titled, “Whole Foods Goes Mobile.”  It’s not every day that retailers, grocers in particular, announce mobile efforts.  So I was excited to see that a specialty grocery chain familiar to me now had some kind of mobile presence.

The news content appears driven by Whole Foods, and underwhelmingly describes the move this way:

“The site basically provides customers with the features of wholefoodsmarkets.com while on the go.”

I am a huge proponent of targeting customers while “on the go” – we blog about it all the time.  However, it’s equally important to consider how your customers’ on the go experience with your brand can be enhanced by a mobile web presence.  Simply scaling your website to the mobile form factor is a shortsighted strategy that can have negative consequences.  Failing to impress the first time makes it that more difficult to approach mobile consumers in the future.  As well, the expected explosion in mobile browsing by consumers means that it will soon be challenging to stand out among the crowd, just like on the “regular” web.

Much attention is paid to mobile applications for platforms like the iPhone, yet research cited in a recent article titled, “Mobile Internet is 450 million users strong and doubling in four years,” suggests businesses in any segment need to develop a solid mobile web strategy, and soon:

“In October, Gartner reported that smartphones accounted for 14 percent of overall mobile device sales, but would grow to 37 percent by 2012.”

“Gartner forecasts 180 million smartphone sales in 2009, exceeding notebooks for the first time. From 2009, Gartner predicts that consumers would spend more on smartphones than notebooks.”

Bottom line is that millions consumers will be armed with quality mobile web browsing devices and drawn to those sites which offer a valuable experience while “on the go.”  Surely scaling down a website to a small screen is insufficient.  Comments posted on Retailwire.com echo this sentiment:

“Perhaps they could integrate some sort of coupon or loyalty program in the mobile app that will get more people to visit.  ‘Flash the barcode on your phone for a discount’ type of thing.  I suspect the average WF customer has some sort of smart phone or is technologically savvy so marketing this way makes sense.”

“No ‘perhaps’ about it…the mobile site should incorporate coupons, loyalty offerings and other ‘do it now’ type features that are unnecessary on the main site.”

“Whole Foods in particular is challenged in today’s value-oriented world.  The company is losing its cachet, for a variety of reasons. It needs to do more than just sell expensive stuff and expect shoppers to assume high quality.  By making an investment in its customers’ shopping experience, it can re-elevate itself to some extent.”

Today I came across a November 25, 2009 MarketingSherpa.com article titled, “One-Two Campaign Punch Grows Email & Mobile Lists: Segmentation Delivers 40% Lift in CTR” that is a great example of Active Customer Engagement in action.  As we have said before, Active Customer Engagement is not so much about mobile as it is targeting consumers “on the go.”  In this case, the targeted customers are truly active, as the example cited in the article is for a retailer of sporting goods, bicycles in particular.

Similar to what we described in our Point of View on Active Customer Engagement and this actual customer example, email, web and mobile communications work together as part of a larger effort consisting of media buys supporting a promotion.  It isn’t apparent that the retailer had access to a system encapsulating all the components required to configure, execute and measure the program, but you can be certain if it did, ROI would have been greater.

A tidal wave of buzz is building around Active Customer Engagement, as illustrated by another recent article outlining the solution here on the Illinois Technology Association website.  Today as well, we were featured in a brief article titled, “Time to market with mobile” at brand-e.biz in which we say the following that gets to the heart of what Active Customer Engagement’s value is all about:

“What should drive mobile marketing investments is a strategy which focuses on the customer experience, what you want to achieve with your customers.  Developing ideal mobile paths for your customers to follow to achieve your goals should yield the best results…And in practice this will almost always mean some combination of text message interactions, mobile applications, mobile optimized web and even e-mail.”

In our Point of View titled, “Mapping Mobile to Your Marketing Strategy,” we describe Champion/Challenger testing as one of the most logical – yet overlooked – applications for mobile marketing.  It’s both important in determining where to align your efforts but is also among the more measurable applications since measurement is the entire focus of the effort.

“Mobile may be the killer tool for testing the effectiveness of marketing messages and various media before a full scale rollout. Text message interactions are often used to this end, and also serve to measure return on investment for advertising across media such as print, billboards, radio and television.”

An article today on MobileMarketer.com brought this to mind, with a list of tips for testing your mobile strategy before executing holiday marketing plans.  I thought the tips were excellent, but marketers should not view testing as a single threaded activity; take the opportunity to test multiple approaches simultaneously against similar populations of targeted customers to see which one represents the greatest potential return.

Strictly speaking, champion/challenger testing is about comparing results of new ideas with those already in production.  So, in a marketing context, this would be akin to testing different discount offers as incentives for signing up for a mobile loyalty program, and comparing the effectiveness of different discount levels at attracting sign ups with those associated with a pre-existing non-mobile program.  The net result offers two benefits: a focused effort you can be more certain will meet your objectives and a direct comparison with non-mobile marketing efforts which should help align marketing budget more wisely.

So when reading the article’s suggested steps to creating a test plan, do so with an eye toward multiple scenarios and comparing results at the conclusion.  For reference, I have paraphrased the prescribed 10 step process:

• Identify the testable “entity” – For example, an SMS text message offer for joining a holiday discount club, the attractiveness of a dedicated holiday shopping application or new e-commerce enabled mobile website.
• What is the metric you are trying to measure?  # of responses, # of new sign ups, conversions between text message interaction and receipt of a discount?  Identify one or multiple attributes which can be measured and compared.
• How will you determine success?  If you are relatively new to mobile, it may be difficult to establish a target for your metrics beyond “finger in the air” guessing.  This is why the champion/challenger concept is especially suited to mobile given you will be able to compare results — ideally with past programs — to use as inputs into creating realistic targets.
• What criteria is necessary to identify when a test should be stopped?  If your test runs several weeks, you may want to cease testing if you observe little to no material difference in measures, or if one idea is simply generating far greater results than the others.
• What measures will you want to monitor for your targeted segments, independent of success metrics?  Migration among value segments/tiers would be one example.
• What other factors could affect the test, such as concurrently running marketing campaigns/promotions or those of your competitors?
• What resources are required, both technical and creative, to execute the test?  Consider both your internal staff and their potentially competing priorities as well as agency and technical third party partners.
• Be sure the proper stakeholders are aware of your plans; sales in the event demand generation is affected, brand marketing in case new messaging, visuals or brand-attributes are components of the test.
• Who is the “test sponsor” – basically the most senior person who signs off on the program.  Have this person identified – be it you or someone else – so you can quickly address any escalations that may occur.
• Time horizon for having the results: have this in mind from the beginning and back off this date to create a testing plan.  With Black Friday just a few days away it’s too late to implement these ideas now but keep them in mind to start off strong in 2010.

Mass marketing is passé, right?  That has long been the trend, as more companies experienced greater success focusing instead on one to one marketing.  Isn’t mobile the most personal of communication channels and therefore the ultimate expression of customer centric marketing?

These thoughts came to mind upon seeing an article on eMarketer.com today titled, “eMarketer Cuts Through the Mobile Penetration Hype.”  The article debates whether distinctions between “mobile subscriber” and “mobile subscriptions” are material in research suggestion the penetration for mobile ranges between 75 and 90 percent of the U.S. population.  Some multi device owning mobile subscribers may be double counted in estimates using subscriptions as the measure, as in figures published by CTIA – The Wireless Association.

As a marketer, whenever I see presentations illustrating the vastness of the mobile marketing opportunity based on the number of people with devices, I cringe a bit.  By now, it should be common knowledge that the majority of people you would wish to market your products or services to have a mobile phone.  The discussion should instead be focused on (1) who are my customers, (2) how can I serve them better, (3) how can I serve them better via the mobile channel, and (4) what means are at my disposal to do so.

Almost everyone has a text message enabled phone, some demographics more closely align with the iPhone and Smartphones more generally, and soon most mobile device users will be capable of receiving a rich mobile web experience.  The mobile industry does itself a disservice by emphasizing the vastness of mobile device penetration, particularly when talking to marketers who will only achieve results by focusing on relevant and timely interactions with their customers.

(Note, at the conclusion of this post is some additional context provided after this initially appeared)

This question came to mind today as I read an October 30, 2009 post on MobileMarketingWatch.com titled “Apple Hits 100k Apps, Does Quantity Matter?”  As the number of applications available for the iPhone passes the 100k barrier, the question of quantity versus quality logically arises.  Particularly in light of its popularity as an advertising and marketing platform.  Is the iPhone somehow less attractive to marketers if their message has to compete with 99,999 others?

I agree with the author’s point that many consumers are drawn to the iPhone due to the sheer number and diversity of apps available – like the ad slogan says, “There’s an app for that.”  With respect to advertisers and marketers, the challenge is ensuring a targeted, high quality application is the goal, along with making it patently clear to consumers that the app is available.  The most successful applications today follow this formula, which is why the iPhone should remain a popular choice for the mobile marketer, particularly for reaching its typical user demographic.

The emergence of Android as an alternative this year and into next seems to pose a threat to Apple’s dominance in mobile applications, assuming that it achieves parity or better.  The post points out, however, that:

“The question remains if Android Apps, which there will be fewer of, at least at first, will be of any higher quality than the Apple apps.  According to AndAppStore, there are 259 apps available for Android including ‘aBubblePop,’ so let’s just say the quality competition, if Android hopes to win it, has yet hit its prime.”

I’d like to suggest that the number or quality of applications may be irrelevant, particularly to marketers.  Applications as a segment may continue to be dominated by Apple into 2010 and beyond simply because of the marketing might Apple brings to the game.  The iPhone business blends the niche, maniacal loyalty of Apple’s traditional computer business with the volume market dominance in MP3 music players.  Overlay Apple’s powerful promotional and branding engine, a single app store and a loyal and growing consumer-base, and Android has an uphill battle to say the least.

I sense already that Android will become a great platform for the mobile web, but not so much applications, due simply to the lack of a strong consumer friendly marketing message, and a single, very easy to use app store.  I’m not confident that a diverse market of carrier App stores will be as appealing as Apple’s.  Marketers should note this as they look to take advantage of Android in their marketing plans.

(Additional Context Note: My colleague John Wood, upon reading this post, brought to my attention that Google is in fact hosting its own large scale App Store at http://www.android.com/market/, and that the number of apps for Android today is closer to 10,000, not the 259 as quoted in the MobileMarketingWatch.com post.  In spite of this, I think Apple’s super consumer friendly approach is going to be a tough nut to crack, but if anyone can do it, it’s going to have to be Google).